add share buttons

Culturing for Better Milk Quality

  • October 9, 2019

There has been increasing interest in dairy farming in agriculture. This can be an effective option for a farm that wants to make treatment decisions more quickly, saving money and determine the cause of mastitis pathogens responsible – especially when local alternatives are not available.

Cultivation of milk at the farm is not for every dairy operation. To be useful, a farm must have enough cows with mastitis problems in their herd to make training and economical equipment.

You can get saber milk via

 clean area separate from the animals, staff members who are dedicated, trained to perform a culture and time is also required for a successful culture program. Finally, a veterinarian should be involved on a regular basis to review the results and culture techniques.

There are four main reasons for milk producers to the dairy farm system:

a better protocol: Farming in the field at the most basic level allows the manufacturer to determine whether the pathogen causing the infection is a gram-positive or gram-negative, or present at all. Thirty percent or more of cows with clinical mastitis has healed itself when the symptoms of mastitis is detected.

Results of culture in the field can push the decision to use antibiotics intramammary, selecting certain drugs that have greater effectiveness against specific pathogens or resist antibiotics and discard the milk until the cows come naturally saber can eliminate the infection.

Timeliness: Farming in the field can give manufacturers the preliminary results within 24 hours. Samples were collected and sent to a lab off-site may require five to seven days for a diagnosis. faster results allows manufacturers to make treatment decisions faster and more precise and get milk back into the tank faster.

Reducing the use of antibiotics: When the treatment protocol was changed to focus on gram-positive mastitis cases, the use of antibiotics can be greatly reduced, allowing farmers to combat the problem more selective and effective.

Cost effectiveness: With targeted treatment, the manufacturer will see a better response to treatment of infections caused by gram-positive pathogens such as staphylococci and some inflammatory environment. A recent study looking at the cost effectiveness of aquaculture land use to identify and treat gram-positive infections only.

John Brace

E-mail :